Jodi Arias: Hell Hath No Fury

Jurors given conflicting views of Jodi Arias


arias2-small

View The Live Tweet Archive HerePHOENIX (AP) — A prosecutor at the sentencing retrial of convicted murderer Jodi Arias showed jurors two photos Tuesday of her ex-boyfriend and victim Travis Alexander.

One was an unremarkable picture of his face taken some time before his death. The other was a crime-scene photo showing his slit throat.

“She loved him so much that this is what she did to him,” prosecutor Juan Martinez said in his opening statement, describing the gruesome suffering Arias inflicted on Alexander before his death in 2008.

“There are no mitigating circumstances in this case. None,” Martinez said. “The only just punishment for this crime is death.”

Arias has acknowledged killing Alexander but claimed it was self-defense after he attacked her. Prosecutors said it was premeditated murder carried out in a jealous rage after the victim wanted to end their affair and planned a trip to Mexico with another woman.

Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi said Tuesday that Arias was the victim of profound sexual humiliation by Alexander, and that she is mentally ill and a victim of child abuse.

He urged jurors to sentence her to life in prison, saying she is remorseful about killing the man who never acknowledged to others that she was his girlfriend.

“Jodi Arias was always the girl behind the closed door in the bedroom,” Nurmi told jurors.

He suggested his client would testify during the proceedings expected to last until December.

“She will tell you how horrified she is that she killed the man she loved,” Nurmi said.

Arias, sporting shoulder-length hair and wearing a beige blouse, often looked at the jury while her lawyer laid out his case. She turned away, however, as the prosecutor detailed the crime that included shooting Alexander in the head and stabbing him nearly 30 times.

Members of the Alexander and Arias families looked on from the front rows of the courtroom during the opening statements.

Jurors were shown naked photographs that Alexander and Arias took of each other shortly before Alexander was killed. Alexander’s sister turned away from the images and wept as the photos were being shown.

Arias, a 34-year-old former waitress, was convicted of murder last year in the killing of Alexander at his suburban Phoenix home, Authorities said she slit his throat so deeply that she nearly decapitated him and left his body in his shower where friends found him after about five days.

Jurors couldn’t agree on a sentence then. Prosecutors have one more chance with a new jury to secure the death penalty, If the jury fails to reach a unanimous decision, the judge will then sentence Arias to spend the rest of her life behind bars or to be eligible for release after 25 years.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Sherry Stephens told the new jury that they had to accept the guilty verdict on the murder charge.

The start of the sentencing retrial was less of a spectacle than the initial case in early 2013, when onlookers from around the country traveled to Phoenix and lined up outside court for the trial that became a tabloid TV sensation. Still, some of the people who regularly attended the first trial were back in court on Tuesday.

The tumultuous relationship of Arias and Alexander became a major part of the obsession with the case as intimate details of their time together were revealed in the courtroom.

The first trial was broadcast live, but Judge Stephens imposed restrictions this time. Cameras are allowed at the retrial, but none of the footage can be broadcast until after it’s finished.

JACQUES BILLEAUD

Source: AP

Copyright 2014 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Share this post!
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Pinterest

Comments

tab  
Trish says:

I watched the entire trial. I still can’t believe that Judge Stevens allowed the defense to claim – with absolutely *N0* evidence – that Travis Alexander was physically abusive and deeply deviant. That was a repulsive decision, Judge Stevens. Perhaps the guilt phase of the trial might not have cost Arizona so many millions of dollars if what was presented to the jurors was limited to what could be demonstrated with evidence. (there certainly would have been way less of the irritating spectacle of cold-blooded murderer and serial stalker Arias pretending to be a frail and damaged flower)

Refusing simultaneous broadcast for the penalty phase is inconsistent with the open trials our Constitution provides for.

   

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *