Dr. Martin MacNeill

Testimony: Michele MacNeill was not at risk of heart attack


macneill4-small
Trial resumes today at 12pm ET. Watch the Martin MacNeill trial live stream here

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A cardiologist testified Friday that the wife of a doctor charged with killing her wasn’t at risk of a heart attack, refuting a defense theory on her cause of death.

Utah cardiologist David Cragun said 50-year-old Michele MacNeill had a mild form of heart disease that wouldn’t have killed her.

Defense lawyers have argued that MacNeill had a heart attack and died after falling into a bathtub in 2007.

The testimony came during the murder trial of Martin MacNeill, 57, a former doctor who prosecutors say hounded his wife to get cosmetic surgery then knocked her out with painkillers, Valium and sleeping pills before leaving her to die in the tub.

On Thursday, Utah medical examiner Todd Grey testified that he could not determine her exact cause of death but said it could have come from a heart attack combined with drug toxicity.

Prosecutors called Cragun and another expert to suggest Michele MacNeill’s death must have involved foul play.

“My opinion is that Michele died as a result of drowning,” testified Joshua Perper, a forensic pathologist from Florida.

Anna Walthall, a mistress of Martin MacNeill, previously testified that he once described over “pillow talk” how he could induce a heart attack in someone that would appear natural.

One of Grey’s subordinates initially ruled that Michele MacNeill’s 2007 death was natural from heart disease, and that she had high blood pressure and was developing myocarditis, or inflamed heart tissue that could have interfered with a normal heart rate or rhythm.

Investigative findings prompted Grey to change the autopsy finding to undetermined — and to add that drug toxicity may have played a role. That opened the way for the murder charge against Martin MacNeill.

Source: AP

Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Share this post!
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Pinterest

Comments

tab  
Brad says:

I am sure they were smiling over this. I am about shit full of news organizations acting unethically.

   
Heather says:

I tend to agree with Brad, I feel that this guy is probably guilty from all of the evidence that I have seen. But if the jury says not guilty he’ll be labeled a murderer anyhow by the media. I don’t think that’s the way the justice system should work. This is not a true reaction from this guy regarding the testimony, and shouldn’t be portrayed as such.

   

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *