Jerry Sandusky

Sandusky dismissal premature without testimony

PITTSBURGH (AP) — A defense request to dismiss child sexual abuse charges against former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky is premature because there has been no sworn testimony in the case, state prosecutors told a judge Friday.

Sandusky’s attorney asked a Centre County judge to dismiss the charges last week, arguing some counts are too vague to defend and others involve victims whose identities haven’t been determined.

But Chief Deputy Attorney General Frank Fina said in his response Friday that the defense’s arguments are based on “assertions,” not “facts,” because there’s been no sworn testimony.

“The absence of a factual record requires this Court to deny those requests,” the prosecutor wrote.

Fina also argued that because Sandusky waived his right to a preliminary hearing — thus acknowledging prosecutors had sufficient probable cause to take the charges to trial — dismissing the charges now would effectively nullify the waiver.

Sandusky, 68, faces 52 criminal counts for the alleged abuse of 10 boys over 15 years, which he has repeatedly denied. School officials’ response to the charges last year ultimately led to the firing of head coach Joe Paterno.

Sandusky’s attorney, Joe Amendola, did not immediately return a call and email seeking comment on Friday.

But in his filing last week, Amendola attacked the charges related to a person described in court records as Victim 2, as well as other purported victims.

As one example, Amendola argued that the charges involving Victim 2 can’t be sustained based on the testimony of Mike McQueary, an assistant football coach who has said he saw Sandusky sexually abuse the boy in a team shower. Prosecutors listed the date of that offense as March 2002 until last week, when the attorney general’s office amended the complaint to February 2001.

But McQueary’s testimony came at a preliminary hearing in December for two Penn State administrators accused of lying to a grand jury and failing to properly report suspected abuse — not in the case against Sandusky.

McQueary hasn’t testified in Sandusky’s case yet, nor have any other witnesses. In addition to waiving the preliminary hearing, the defense has dropped some other pretrial motions that would have required testimony.

The prosecution response also addressed Amendola’s argument based on an unrelated case involving a 22-year-old mentally challenged victim who testified he had been sexually abused but “could not give any indication as to the time of year, the month, day, or date when the crime occurred.” Amendola has argued some of the allegations against Sandusky are so vague time-wise that his right to present an alibi and other defenses is being compromised.

An appellate court reversed the conviction in the case Amendola cited, but Fina argued that happened post-trial — once the court had testimony and other evidence to consider — not before the trial. The prosecutor also noted that Sandusky’s case is different from the one Amendola cited, which involved allegations of a single act of abuse against one victim.

“Here, this Defendant (Sandusky) is responsible for a sad catalogue of assaults perpetrated on numerous victims of the course of the Defendant’s entire career,” Fina wrote.

Jury selection is scheduled to begin in a Bellefonte courtroom on June 5.


Source: AP

Copyright 2012 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Share this post!
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Pinterest



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *