Colorado Movie Theater Massacre

Theater shooting lawyers in court to discuss video

This June 4, 2013 file photo shows Aurora theater shooting suspect James Holmes in court in Centennial, Colo. Holmes is returning to court as his lawyers challenge possible trial testimony about computer analysis and data. A judge is set to hear arguments about the issue beginning Thursday, Oct. 10, 2013. Holmes is accused of killing 12 people and injuring 70 when he opened fire on a packed movie theater in the Denver suburb of Aurora in 2012. (AP Photo/The Denver Post, Andy Cross, Pool, File)CENTENNIAL, Colo. (AP) — Attorneys in the Colorado theater shooting case are returning to court to discuss whether a doctor should be allowed to videotape the second sanity evaluation of defendant James Holmes.

At a two-day hearing beginning Tuesday, prosecutors and the defense are also scheduled to discuss defense motions to bar some expert testimony about chemicals, metals and firearms.

Holmes pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to charges of killing 12 people and injuring 70 in the July 20, 2012, attack on a suburban Denver theater. Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.

Holmes will undergo a second sanity evaluation this summer. The judge ruled the first one was flawed.

The key conclusion of the first exam has not been made public — whether Holmes could tell right from wrong at the time of the shootings.

An evaluation is mandatory for defendants who plead insanity under Colorado law, but it is not the final word. Jurors decide whether a defendant was insane, and the evaluation is a key piece of the evidence they consider.

If Holmes is found insane, he will be committed to the state hospital indefinitely. If convicted, he could be sentenced to death or life in prison.

The doctor who will conduct the second evaluation has said video is more accurate and comprehensive than handwritten notes. The doctor, whose name has not been released, suggested both sides could be barred from seeing the video and that it could be destroyed once his report is submitted.

Defense lawyers objected, saying the law doesn’t authorize video and that research shows it affects patients’ responses. Prosecutors did not object.

The judge is also expected to confirm Dec. 8 as the latest trial date. Two previous dates were canceled because pretrial issues required more time to resolve.

Separately, the judge might hear arguments on a defense request for the disciplinary records of two police officers listed as prosecution witnesses.

Prosecutors said both were found to have made untrue statements in other investigations. The officers are opposing the request.

Source: AP

Copyright 2014 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Share this post!
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Pinterest



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *